Fug v. Attractive: Ed Helms Edition

via theinquistr.com

So being in Vegas is making me wish I was here with my friends experiencing The Hangover.  Or at least the watered down version The Slight Hangover Caused by a Night of Drinking and Dancing, Not From Stealing a Tiger (coming to a theater near you!).  It has also made me ponder the attractiveness of Ed Helms.  You know what this means: TO THE COURTROOM!

Exhibit A:

via trailershut.com

Nerdy, and not in a cute way.

Exhibit B:

via 2011latestmovies.blogspot.com

I deem this adorbs.

Exhibit C:

via chrismoviecorner.com

Let's-go-to-my-lake-house cute.

Exhibit D:

via becksmithhollywood.com

Creepy History teacher.

Read on for the final piece of evidence and the jury's decision.

Fug v. Attractive: Dave From Happy Endings

Because I'm still not over this week's Happy Endings, we're going to continue it a little further.  Everyone was having sex dreams about Dave and it got me thinking. Hmmm he is good looking....but also not.

To the courtroom!

The defense enters exhibits A, B, and C:

Read on for the closing argument and judge's decision.

Fug v. Attractive: The Country Edition

I have been thinking about this since Sunday's Grammy Awards. And then I started thinking it again this Monday when I watched  The Voice.

Is Blake Shelton Attractive?

He's pretty handsome in a tux, right? I believe that there are a few things that make men more attractive than the actually are:
1. A tuxedo
2. A guitar
3. A baby/toddler (preferably one that is not their own)

But now look at this photo:

Not attractive, right?  I believe that there are a few things that make men LESS attractive than the actually are:
1. Jackets with a fur lined collar
2. A mustache that looks like that
3. Hanging bangs

So, readers...Blake Shelton. Attractive? Please help.

Also, please note that Steph would be SO angry if she knew I was putting country on this blog. Sorry, Steph.

And now a picture of me and Steph NOT wearing jackets with fur lined collars (but I appear to be rather sun burned)!

Fug v. Attractive: David Beckham Edition

Happy hangover!  Let's treat your case of the Mondays by judging someone, it always makes me feel better to be unnecessarily bitchy.

Today's case of Fug vs. Attractive brings us David Beckham

WHHHHHHAT you ask?  Hear me out, we will be using video evidence in this trial, which means sound.  Now, we'll be positive and stay on the side of attractiveness so the prosecution will be making it's case for the Fug verdict.  

The prosecution would like to start the trial with this:

Oy that voice.  So off-putting.  And not matching with the rest of the package.

The defense takes into account the voice issue and presents it's counter argument:

The prosecution would like to use their closing argument to harp on the voice factor.  It really grates on them.  Like really.  Like mind numbing nails on the chalk board.

Read on the the defense's closing argument (WORTH IT) and the trial verdict.

Fug v. Attractive: James McAvoy Edition

Good morning sunshines!  Today I bring you another riddle to figure out: Fug or Attractive: James McAvoy Edition.  Known for such dashing roles in Atonement and Becoming Jane, it can be quite the tricky riddle. Let's see the evidence:

Brooding James 

You Prob Don't Want to Be Left Alone In a Room With Me James

Oh Hey, Don't You Look Nice, I Have No Shirt On James

Does Weird Things To Animals James

Read on for my closing argument and verdict.

Fug v. Attractive: Harry Connick Jr. Edition

This is an interesting phenomenon that I can't explain, and few fit into this category.  Our first example: Harry Connick Jr., Olivia Benson's latest love and Grace Adler's beloved husband.  Let's take a look at the evidence.

Very attractive man.  Seemingly.